MISANDRY
Judges, Barristers, Constables, Doctors, and Nurses destroyed Paul-Robert's life by ignoring that his children were kidnapped on April 15th, 2013. Everyone was interested more in money that they could get from Hipkiss through TD Insurance, Premium Insurance, and Security National Insurance. They didn't want to support a Victim's Health Care or Rehabilitation. They didn't even prepare for Trial. They never recognised Paul-Robert as an English Teacher. Nor, did they want to support a father of three beautiful Children. "Sexism in Canada against men does exist!" It's called MISANDRY! This is my cry!
99 + PEOPLE & MORE WERE INVOLVED !!!
Judges:
Robert N. Beaudoin, Ian M. Carter, Anne Margaret Colterman, Derek Mendes da Costa, George Czutrin, Stephen Louis Dibblee, Adriana Doyle, Marie T. Fortier, Angus Grant, Paul Max Harris, Craig Haynes, Mitchell S. Hoffman, Imran E. Kamal, Stanley Jay Kershman, Marc R. Labrosse, Jean Guy Legualt, Sylvie Lapointe, Jean Guy Legault, Calum U. C. MacLeod, Chief Justice Lise Maisonneuve, James E. McNamara, Daniel McSweeny, Timothy P. Minnema, Julianne A. Parfett, Giovanna Toscano Roccamo, Andrew Ian Seymour, Judge Sheppard, Robert J. Smith, Narissa Somji, Jocelyne Aline St. Jean, Darlene L. Summers, and Heather J. Williams.
Barristers:
Ariane Joan Asselin, Carolyn Dawn Baglole, Judith Alison Campbell, Alicia Chiesa, Isabelle Ann Corbeil, Michael Davies, Danielle Bari Dworsky, Charles Jacques Genest, Virve Tuulikki Georgeson, Jennifer Leanne Grant, Jessica C. Grant, Lawrence Greenspon, Joseph William Lyall Griffiths, Mikolaj T. Grodzki, Ahmed Hamzeh, Natalie Hanna, Mark Erik Hecht, Jennifer Lan Phuong Ho, Brenda Lynn Hollingsworth, Catherine Marcella Huot, Kevin Jacobs, Daniel Jessop, Moiz Murtaza Karimjee, Piyali Kundu, Lisa Marie Kristen Langevin, Patrice Lavoie, Patricia Alexandra Lawson, Xiaobin Li, Heather Lishak, James MacGillivray, Fady Mansour, Shaikh Masum, Todd Joseph McCarthy, Dawood Nasir, Lynn Parker, Kevin Panton, Stephanie Pearce, Marc Nicholas Quinn, Martin Reesink, Kelly Santini, Anastasia Simos, John T. Sloan, Michael Raymond Switzer, Kevin Michael Temple, Michael Karl Edgar Thiele, Rhona Waxman, Loïc Welch, and Marwa Racha Younes.
Medical Doctors:
Daniel Andrew, Julia Grazyna Baryla, John Brooks, Claire Chapdelaine, Walter Delpero, Paul Duhamel, Steve Joncas, Cameron, Jones, Lara Colette Kent, Jacinthe Lampron, Charles Leclerc, Sharon Liska, Shawn Calder Marshall, Tilak Mendis, Simeon Mitchell, Sujay Vinod Patel, Kimberley Ann Payne, Laura Marie Rees, Francine Fleur-Ange Saranzi, Vasco Da Silva, James Villeneuve, Melissa Vyvey, Kristine Whitehead, Megan Williams, Michael Yuan-Chu Woo, and Emil Zamora.
Nurses & Occupational Therapists:
Connie Coburn, Natalie Luimes, Heather Macgregor, Myka Riopel, Judy Romanchuck, Shelly Stephenson, and Nathan Woodruff.
TD Insurance:
Denise Fenlon, Ramona Kerr, Shaikh Masum, Wayne Nunes, Cherivic Paculaba, Lynn Parker, Chris Potoczek, Delia Ravindran, James Russell (TD Insurance's CEO), Anastasia Simos, Nancy Stobbs, and Meagan Whittaker.
The Constabulary Service:
Dakota Bashford, Christopher Bisaillon, Brenda Colotelo, Constable Coldwell, Jennifer Delia, Sergeant Hayes, Kevin Jacobs, Damian Levesque, Constable Mann, Tyler McPhee, Andrew Milton, Christine Schulz, Detective Dwight T. Stewart, Sergeant Colin Stokes, Trevor Watson, and Gregory Miles Watts.
Children's Aide Society of Ottawa:
Laura Bowerman, Lara Cebryk, Sarah Jarvis, and Ann-Marry Zietak.
Postscript:
There were others like Attendant Care Specialists, Physiotherapists, Chiropractors, and Gym Trainers. However, those people that I had been involved with were really special to me and helped me more than most other unprofessional people listed above, so I thought of keeping them anonymous.
THE KIDNAPPING OF THREE CHILDREN
The Criminal Code of Canada, Section #280.1 clearly states that "every person who, without lawful authority, takes or causes to be taken a person under the age of 16 years out of the possession of and against the will of the parent or guardian of that person or of any other person who has the lawful care or charge of that person is guilty of (a) an indictable offence..." There was no Temporary Court Order for Custody at Family Court; thus, there was no "lawful authority" to abscond. There was no violence perpetuated upon the children or anyone else either; thus, there was no "just cause" to kidnap. Therefore and in conclusion, Paul-Robert's 3 Kids were kidnapped! Barrister Judith Alison Campbell was the orchestrator of the kidnapping. P-Rob's wife, SoRa Shin, is a Korean national of which Paul-Robert brought to Canada. He taught her everything he knew about Canada, but he never taught her about the art of kidnapping; thus, it was indeed barrister Judith Alison Campbell who orchestrated the kidnapping. The Children's Aide Society of Ottawa had been involved, too. They had concurred that there was no violence, no abuse either. And, as a result of this criminal absconding, Paul-Robert had to find his boys himself for "5 Days & 5 Nights" because no-one would tell him where they were. Can you imagine how pissed off he must have been? How irate he probably was? How much anger he probably had? But, when Paul-Robert found them, he became relieved and cried with the boys. Alas! Realistically however, everybody was very lucky that P-R did not manslaughter the people that were in the home when he found his boys - people that were responsible for the kidnapping. Amen! Paul-Robert was a hero! Yet, since that moment, he never really got back the loving relationship that he once had with his sweet boys. He had to fight for 2 years in the courts to uphold his children's right to associate with him, their loving father. For those 2 years, he and his children were constantly denied access to each other all because of barristers Judith Alison Campbell and Danielle Bari Dworsky. But, in the end, Paul-Robert and his boys finally won the right to their coveted "sleepover" on October 29th, 2014 - access was finally granted and ordered by Judge Stanley Kershman. So, on that same day, he hurried to Barrhaven from downtown Ottawa to tell his boys the good news. Then, on his way to tell them, a reckless driver by the name of Gaetan Comeau hit him from behind at a School-Zone while crossing a crosswalk! Paul-Robert's life was changed forever. Thereafter, TD Insurance, Premium Insurance, and Security National Insurance treated him the same way for another 7 years just like barristers Campbell and Dworsky had treated him before, not as a former loving father. In conclusion, the sexism against men in Canada destroyed P-R's life. All Paul-Robert wanted to do was love his boys, but he had to prove that he loved them in the courts, yet his wife did not have to prove her love. CANADA IS A SEXIST, MISANDRIST COUNTRY! It must stop!
2 years of having to prove to barristers and case workers that he loved 3 boys.
10 years Hipkiss had to prove to judges & barristers he wasn't a single man.
Why? Because of a defunct court that never recognised P-R as a parent.
Perhaps, this may be one of the causes of homicides in Canada?
Men in Canada must prove that they love their children?
This experience has become a mirror for all to see.
P-R's experience was a case of misandry.
The practice about children's suffering.
Everyone argued for 2 years that P-R used to make a lot of money.
Everyone argued for 10 years that Hipkiss was a vagabond.
Everyone did this against three children in Ottawa.
Everyone infringed upon all of their rights.
Everyone made a lot of money.
Everyone neglected kids.
Everyone was guilty.
STOP
5
DAYS
STOP
5
NIGHTS
Paul-Robert slept in his Jeep while looking around town for his 3 Kids!
+ How can a victim receive proper, positive rehabilitation when placed constantly in adversarial conflicts and legal battles for 10 years concerning financial support for health, safety, and rehabilitation?
+ After almost 11 years of criminal harassment, kidnapping, parental alienation, court proceedings, deniability, absconding, misleading of justice, theft, unprofessional conduct, malfeasance, forgery, deprivation, fraud, adversarial conflicts, unconstitutional practices, failure to provide the necessities of life, improprieties, and legal battles, a child no longer remains a child with a loving memory of a parent, nor does the parent either of the child. Lives Were Destroyed! All because of the courts!
SHOULDN'T SOMEONE GO TO JAIL?
Should Paul-Robert have walked away and not fight for his 3 Boys' Human Right to Association?
Why won't anyone arrest Judith Alison Campbell for the orchestration of the kidnapping of 3 Boys?
The Divorce Act of Ontario clearly states that a divorce is between "spouse," not parent and child!
Running around Ottawa for "5 Days & 5 Nights" trying to find his kids is okay in Canada?
Hipkiss is lucky that P-R didn't commit manslaughter in the heat of passion when he found his 3 Boys!
So as a result of the Pedestrian Car Crash, Hipkiss now must honour P-R in a different way. Teaching English has become an impossibility due to spelling issues, so why not teach Canadians about the Horrors of Misandry within the courts? If Hipkiss is not allowed to drive or fly any longer, then Hipkiss will walk the talk and talk the walk on home turf - Ontario. The "Love of Innocence" for men is the cornerstone of the love for their babies. Societies teaches men to defend and die for their babies. The love of a child from a father is the greatest love of all. Mingle with it not! Taking away a father's child must be why people are manslaughtered in the heat of passion. So, barristers must never orchestrate the absconding of a child for the sake of a divorce. No! No! No! Because, this is what can happen to a loving Daddio just like what happened to Paul-Robert! Ok?
Why Couldn't Professionals tell Hipkiss what happened?
Hipkiss had to find out himself by reading the hospital files! Wow...
- Scoliosis x2, Myoclonus, Hypo-Bipolar, Tinnitus, Dementia, Claustrophobia, Hypothermia, Dyslexia, Information Delay, dyslexia, and Information Overload.
- Cervical Whiplash, Dislocated xiphoid, sternum, thoracic, lumbar, abductor, inguinal hernia, rhomboid, cuboid, and toe.
- Never mind Acquired Brain Injury. That's a doctor's Last Frontier. They'll never know.
Just a few more...
La "Prima Facie" est à l'hôpital!
Hipkiss had to order the medical files himself to Discover Reality!
HIPKISS HAD TO BECOME HIS OWN DOCTOR!
Then, Barristers Wanted Hipkiss to Shut Up!
Hipkiss knew that he had to caution graduates of Law School and teach them to never take away his Fundamental Freedom of Speech. So, Hipkiss bit the bullet and wrote his "Victim Statement" and handed it into the Ottawa Courts with Affidavit of Service on the UN's Anniversary of the Human Rights Charter - December 10th, 2019. There shan't be any defunct Non-Disclosure/Gag-Clause thrown in Hipkiss' direction. A Trial must be the only option. This way, the Freedom of Speech can be protected.
Affidavits, Debriefings, Complaints, & Letters...
Hipkiss wrote lots: Freedom of Speech, Chief Justice Complaint, the Best Interest of a Child, A Factum to Justice Heather Williams, Child & Youth Tribunal, Law Suit to Protect Freedom of Speech, Tears, and Women in the Workplace. And of course, www.abi-1.xyz!
Since Hallowe'en Day of 2019, the need to learn how to write again continued with more than 33+ Complaints to the Law Society of Ontario, the Canadian Judicial Council, the Association of Judges of Ontario, Chief Justice L. Maisonneuve, the College of Surgeons & Physicians, the Colleges of Psychiatry and Psychology, the Colleges of Nurses and Occupational Therapists, the RCMP, the OPP, the Metropolitan Toronto Police, the Durham Regional Police, the Securité d'Hull Sq., and the Ottawa Police Service. Just to prove "Misandry" and how it is culturally practised in the courts of Canada. No arrests!
Dear Bobby Letters...
Hipkiss wrote to Toronto, Durham, Ottawa, Nepean, & Pembroke Police Services, and the Hull-Urbain Sqc. about accusations of Sexist White Collar Crimes.
Hipkiss always thought that they would not get back to him, or not do much at all.
They really did nothing! More proof of Misandry!
EXPOSITORY
DISCOVERIES x 2
1. First Discovery: Hipkiss wanted to meet Gaetan Comeau, the reckless driver. He merely wished to know what happened. He didn't care if it were bad or good. He brought a pen as a gift for him, so that they could write their stories together. Barrister Patricia Lawson was given one of his many essays called "Women in the Workplace" as gift, too. He just wanted to know. He ended up having a seizure. Barrister Charles Genest and Patricia Lawson did not wish to halt the proceeding. They continued their abuse of this Victim. Comeau passed in the end. Hipkiss shall never know what happened that tragic moment. The driver was the key witness.
2. Second Discovery: Again, Hipkiss just wanted to know, however, now in more detail from barristers. Nothing. Barrister Joseph Griffiths kept on confusing Hipkiss' altered mind with some witch hunt about a job in 1981. Hipkiss didn't care, nor could he remember. He just wanted to know what happened on October 29th, 2014. Nothing! Barrister Griffiths continued. Hipkiss had a Panic Attack, got up and walked out of the hearing. Barristers Griffiths and Mikolaj Grodzki wanted to continue their abusive interrogation. No more!
Victims Have the Right to Know!
Discoveries Are for Both Defendant & Plaintiff!
No Barrister Went to Jail for Tripping Up a Victim!
Stop Victimising a Victim!
$$$
Audio Recordings...
Forgetfulness: More Ideas to Remember...
TRANSPARENCY vs. AUSTERITY
There are more recordings. Click Here
FREEDOM
EDUCATE
COURTS
THANKS
DRIVING:
Driving is not a privilege. Ok. It's an Earnt Right. Period.
One cannot take away a person's License to Drive just to prove that a person is disabled. Why? 'Cause it's an Earnt Right. There are Natural Rights. For example, if you can breathe, you have the right to clean oxygen. Then, there are Human Rights. In other words, people have the right to speak because it is actually human to do so, as well as to think up a storm - literally. Lastly, there are Earnt Rights. If a person spent years building his or her lot, then any government that wishes the lot must pay justifiable recompense. The person earnt the lot. It is an Earnt Right. Welcome to Planet Earth...
reHabilitation:
- If people think that Hipkiss cannot drive because barristers wanted to make it look like he was more disabled than he was, then TD must drive him hither and thither as he pleases until he can himself or until he dies. He had earnt the right to drive in Iraq and beyond. Alright! If not, then provide Hipkiss with a vehicle like a Jeep. But, he is a Vagrant Single Man according to TD. Hipkiss is not deserving! Right?
Basic Necessities of Life (Criminal Code):
215 (1) Every one is under a legal duty
(c) to provide necessaries of life to a person under his charge if that person
(i) is unable, by reason of detention, age, illness, mental disorder or other cause, to withdraw himself from that charge, and
(ii) is unable to provide himself with necessaries of life.
Hipkiss used to get a small cheque from TD for $370. One cannot support 3 Boys in Canada with that kind of money. Youthfulness can empty a kitchen cupboard. TD used to send Hipkiss frozen foods for a Single Vagrant Man, not a father of three. When the 3 Boys used to visit, frozen foods or take-outs were the only things available. Cooking had become a fire hazard for Hipkiss due to his forgetfulness. He had to feed the boys somehow, so he would give them most of the frozen foods and take-outs. Paul-Robert used to be an XLarge Man. But, due to criminal negligence, Hipkiss is now a Medium Man. Hipkiss had to starve for the sake of his kids! Why? All because of the sexism that began in Family Court, which in turn perpetuated itself into Insurance Court. Where was barrister Judith Alison Campbell? Was that the "best interested of a child" or even a Victim? If that ain't Misandry, then nothing else is. Reality Check Please: if Hipkiss were a woman with 3 Children, does anyone sincerely think that TD would have treated him that way? People would have jumped through hoops in order to support a woman with three children. So really, where was barrister Judith Alison Campbell for 7 years? She never filed a Family Court Motion throughout those 7 years for better support from TD. She did not have the best interest of the children at heart. She waited until the end just for the money that she could make. Barrister Judith Alison Campbell must be disbarred from practising law. To orchestrate a kidnapping of 3 Boys just for the purpose of a divorce, and then to Fail and Provide the Necessities of Life for 3 Boys & a father - well, if these are not grounds for disbarment, then what is?
And That's What I Gotta Say 'bout That!
- Hipkiss had to provide Quotes because of trust issues.
- He told nurses and occupational therapist that the Ottawa Hospital's Oxygen Chamber was better for him.
- But, he couldn't get accept to the hospital because an insurer was involved - "Two-Tier Medical System!"
- TD likes to Stall & to Claw.
- The patient was left to a private health care system according to the Insurer. Pay back the hospital then!
- Ontario Disability (ODSP) was never paid back by TD. That's a lot of money, folks. The taxpayer paid it all.
- But, TD was allowed to claw at Canada's Privy Purse.
- Hold the Insurer responsible and accountable!
- Corporate Oligarchs must not rip off the taxman!
Ur COMPLICITY = Ur CRIME
In 2015, Hipkiss had asked a manager at Ottawa Hospital to calculate the cost of having him at hospital. Nothing was done. Canada deserves a bankrupt health care?
Why Does a Taxpayer Have to Pay?
MISOGYNY
TD DID NOT ACCEPT PAUL-ROBERT'S TEACHING CAREER
MISANDRY TURNS INTO MISOGYNY
EXTORTION IN CANADA IS NOT A CRIME
346 (1) Every one commits extortion who, without reasonable justification or excuse and with intent to obtain anything, by threats, accusations, menaces or violence induces or attempts to induce any person, whether or not he is the person threatened, accused or menaced or to whom violence is shown, to do anything or cause anything to be done.
Saving:
(2) A threat to institute civil proceedings is not a threat for the purposes of this section.
A judge would have heard what he experienced.
Now O.D.S.P. must pay for his therapy.
Maybe Hipkiss Would've Been Better Off Dead?
* The facts that are within this website and are of matters that Hipkiss had demanded be address to a judge.
* It mustn't be any wonder that he was constantly told to shut up.
* His facts were about those who practise law illegally at the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario, Ottawa.
Now Hipkiss Understands
Trust is earnt, never given!
I Hope to Find
PEACE!
Queen Elizabeth II had made known in 2013 that the "Succession to the Crown Act" in England end the centuries-old practice of a younger son superseding an elder daughter in the line of succession.
So, if the queen can treat men and women equally from within her own family unit, then Canadian Society must treat men and women equally within its own family unit as well.
EGALITARIANISM
I needed to find peace in my soul. It started with finding some post-cards at the Rideau Centre, Ottawa, so I sent them. The legal way with a stamp. Then, I bought some Thank You Cards, so I sent them, too. Lastly I thought, "Why not send a Thank You Letter to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II?" So, I did. I also sent similar ones to Prime Minister Justin Pierre James Trudeau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., and Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raybould.
I had so much to be thankful.
Peace is in the soul and not with a psychiatrist, nor a psychologist. If you cannot find your soul, please speak to an Imam, a Monk, or a Priest. They know lots about the soul. Seriously. Peace.
LOVE
dad.
yes, son.
please don't leave.
i’m not going anywhere, son. now come here. don’t cry.
i don’t want you to leave, dad.
i won’t leave. don’t cry. it’s okay, son.
give me a hug. okay.
is that not better?
don’t worry. i shall always be here. i love you.
now jump in the jeep. come on. let me help. there you go. let's buckle.
let’s go for a drive and get some ice cream.
ok, dad.
i love you.
i love you too, dad.
1982: P-R's1st Child was "Killed" by his mother despite fighting in the courts at 1 Nicholas St., Ottawa.
1995: P-R's 2nd Child was "Put Up for Adoption" despite proving and fighting in Hamilton's Unified Family Courts that he was in fact the father because no DNA test were available in the 1988.
2013: P-R's 3rd, 4th, & 5th Children were "KIDNAPPED" and "Denied Access" to him all for the sake of a divorce; and after that, he was never given "Equal Parenting Rights" to his own children concerning future prospects despite fighting in the Superior Court of Justice of Ontario for a decade.
"Men Do Not Have Reproductive Rights in Canada!"
The Wheels of Justice Are Slow! Patience Is Perseverance!
Then Again, What Does Anyone Know?
Time to Let People Read What Is Written!
"NO GO!"
The "No Go" Hipkissology Theory:
...no joke...
All forms of emotion are part of human life. One must never deny one's self of any form of emotion. It is human. Nothing more. Nothing less. To deal with each one in kind and in jest is actually most honourable. All things in moderation. Beware, however. There is one practice that is least favoured. It is hatred itself. Not likeness. Not admiration. Not love. It's hatred alone. Perhaps, this is why it is commonly understood as a radical and heinous form of emotion. The reason being is that hate can breed violence and death; or at best, some extreme custom of anger, let alone despicable acts of assault or abuse. None the lesser, nor the wiser. Many people end up suffering as a result - all around suffering consequences to say the least. Nothing but degradation and heartache. Honour diminished. Achievements denied. Dreams terminated. Nothing positive at all. Therefore, hate has nothing to give a person who wishes honour. Release the hatred. Garner the honour for a life well lived. This must become a person's emotion of desire.
"Words Matter"
Please Focus on the Meaning of the Words That Are Herein. Thank You.
Now, here are some laws in Canada:
CCC - 34 (1) A person is not guilty of an offence if: (a) they believe on reasonable grounds that force is being used against them or another person or that a threat of force is being made against them or another person; (b) the act that constitutes the offence is committed for the purpose of defending or protecting themselves or the other person from that use or threat of force; and (c) the act committed is reasonable in the circumstances.
CCC - 232 (1) Culpable homicide that otherwise would be murder may be reduced to manslaughter if the person who committed it did so in the heat of passion caused by sudden provocation.
CCC - 236 Every person who commits manslaughter is guilty of an indictable offence and liable: (a) where a firearm is used in the commission of the offence, to imprisonment for life and to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of four years; and (b) in any other case, to imprisonment for life.
After searching for 3 Lovely Boys for "5 Days & 5 Nights" in 2013, and during a moment of extreme heated passion, should Paul-Robert have committed manslaughter?
The answer to this rhetorical question is obvious, "Duh! Of course, Not!"
So, then how come barrister Judith Alison Campbell hasn't been disbarred yet for orchestrating the kidnapping of three little boys, as well as some other associate graduates of Law School that did nothing for a decade plus?
What man says "NO" to Millions of Dollars? A man who demands justice.
Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the world - not the weak.
Imagine:
...no joking...
- Your spouse and/or associates selling your Ford Taurus while overseas.
- Your spouse and/or associates forges your signature to force a Landlord/Tenant Settlement worth $15,000 while overseas.
- Your spouse and/or associates forges your signature to sell your 2-Acre Land worth $25,000 while overseas in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
- Your spouse receives direct deposits of $2,000/month from you while you're overseas teaching and all of the above just happened to you.
- Your spouse demands that her and/or her associates' crimes be hidden.
- Your spouse hires a lawyer to orchestrate the kidnapping of your kids for the purpose of a divorce, whence a divorce is only between spouse - not between the parent and the child. Besides, you were never married in Canada anyway.
- Your spouse changes the lock to your front door of your home, and now you can't get into your own home in order to get your Ventolin Inhaler.
- Your spouse and/or associates denies you access to your 3 Boys for 2 Years.
And Now, You Have to Find Your 3 Boys by Yourself!
! - IMAGINE - !
+ After a person experiences his or her children kidnapped just to physically local them without the assistance of law enforcement or the judiciary, is this person in the heat of passion culpable of 1st Degree, 2nd Degree, or Manslaughter?
+ After a person experiences Misleading of Justice, Criminal Harassment, Criminal Extortion, & Negligence at the behest of lawyers is this person in a heat of passion?
What happened to P-R's Children on April 15th, 2013?
What should Paul-Robert have done?
Exactly what he did do indeed!
He did not slaughter!
He exercised the "No-Go" approach despite his Regrets.
But, Paul-Robert fought in Family Courts just to get hit by a car, in the end. That's what he did. Yes. As he was crossing a crosswalk just to tell his boys that they could have their coveted "sleepovers" once again. 2-Years of fighting to prove that he loved his boys. And then, bang! Sometimes in life, one must stand up for what one believes, love being the greatest, for righteousness is just and love always a must. P-R did not walk away.
+2 Years of Family Court
+7 Years of Insurance Court
+2 Years of Criminal Fundamental Freedom Court
= 11+ Years of the Criminal Gates of Hades
Now, if Hipkiss had a time machine and went back in time...
To whisper into Paul-Robert's ear...
About all the things that will happen...
What would he have done?
He did...
But, Paul-Robert did what he could. Now, you all know what happened to him and three lovely children in the community. Let's change things! Let's start with an interest in equality, which is beautiful and children love it, too. Egalitarianism can only be achieved through realism. Otherwise, what is to be made equal, fictitiousness? Not! Men just want to love their children like mothers.
No matter what happens in your life, you must live it to its end.
Your mortal coil's end, that is.
You have had the privilege to breathe your first breath naturally.
You ought to have the honour to breathe your last breath peacefully.
Be an Egalitarian in life with equal measure in all things.
Live life in kind and in jest, for it is short.
Justice for one, justice for all.
Peace be with you.
Thank you.
-^-
Hope you learnt rather than angered.
Unnatural death is never advised. Never, ever...
True understanding may be the greatest prevention of all.
Please think about what I have written. No ill intent, for life is short. Peace.
-^-
Trusting the Courts
Paul-Robert Was a Hero!
Appellant Court of Justice:
Okay, what just happened? Ottawa's Finest arrested who? They detained Hipkiss? Sent to Blackburn Hamlet? You gotta be kidding me, eh? All because of a rhetorical?
You arrested Hipkpiss because of "Uttering a Threat" to his wife over an electronic mail that he sent to barrister Judith Alison Campbell, the Law Society, Chief Justice, and countless other unprofessional lawyers and constables? Say what? Never did he send anything to his wife, nor children, chiropractors, friends, or family - only to individuals that work with the Ministry of Justice. He even titled many of his "Subject Titles" as an "Awareness" or "Public Awareness," specifically on what to look for in a judiciary concerning child and spouse. More importantly, on how to protect women by looking through a lens of "Reverse Psychology." He wrote in the 3rd Party Omniscient with a Rhetorical Question: "Should he have committed manslaughter?" The answer once again is obvious: "Duh! Of course, not!" The rhetorical question was intended as a reflective thought of matter analysis in order to illicit the disbarment of barrister Judith Alison Campbell. He never intended to threaten his wife. What for? Say what? You can blow carbon dioxide in his direction and he'll fall over. He ain't uttered no threat to nobody. Besides, he hasn't had a conversation with his wife in over 10 years, let alone utter a threat to her. That's just crazy! After what he's been put through for a decade, everyone else has become a threat to him - not the other way around. Oh, goodness gracious... He has even asked Justice of the Peace, Anne Margaret Colterman, on February 1st, 2023 for Show Cause to order a restraint against his wife and all of her associates and kin. But, nothing. Why? Because Hipkiss is a man who is not worthy of protection. Persons cannot see how Hipkiss is more vulnerable than a woman, let alone a child. In the end, after having surgery on his Tear Glans at Riverside Hospital, he failed to attend a judicial procedural meet that was scheduled on November 23rd, 2023, but he thought it meant the 28th. He went on the 28th of November, 2023 just to be informed about his brain injured mishap and thus to be detained. Since that day, he cried, cried, and cried. Not because he ended up in a medical ward upon detainment, no, because of the realisation that it was his brain injury that prevented him from getting Justice and to see things through - the process.
CCC - 264.1 (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat: (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person.
(2) Every one who commits an offence under paragraph (1)(a) is guilty of (a) an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years; or (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
Yet, these Crimes Were Committed against Hipkiss.
CCC - 137 Every one who, with intent to mislead, fabricates anything with intent that it shall be used as evidence in a judicial proceeding, existing or proposed, by any means other than perjury or incitement to perjury is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
CCC - 280(1) Abduction of person under sixteen. It is a criminal offence to take an unmarried person under the age of 16 out of the possession of and against the will of their parent or legal guardian, punishable by up to five years imprisonment.
CCC - 180 (1) Every person is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than two years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who commits a common nuisance and by doing so: (a) endangers the lives, safety or health of the public, or (b) causes physical injury to any person. (2) For the purposes of this section, every one commits a common nuisance who does an unlawful act or fails to discharge a legal duty and thereby: (a) endangers the lives, safety, health, property or comfort of the public; or (b) obstructs the public in the exercise or enjoyment of any right that is common to all the subjects of Her Majesty in Canada.
CCC - 215 (1) Every one is under a legal duty: (a) as a parent, foster parent, guardian or head of a family, to provide necessaries of life for a child under the age of sixteen years; (b) to provide necessaries of life to their spouse or common-law partner; and (c) to provide necessaries of life to a person under his charge if that person - (i) is unable, by reason of detention, age, illness, mental disorder or other cause, to withdraw himself from that charge; and (ii) is unable to provide himself with necessaries of life.
All Because of Barrister Judith Alison Campbell!
139 (1) Every one who wilfully attempts in any manner to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice in a judicial proceeding: (a) by indemnifying or agreeing to indemnify a surety, in any way and either in whole or in part, or (b) where he is a surety, by accepting or agreeing to accept a fee or any form of indemnity whether in whole or in part from or in respect of a person who is released or is to be released from custody - is guilty of (c) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or (d) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
? Was Paul-Robert or Hipkiss Guilty under Duress ?
? What man says "Yes!" to Freedom ?
Last Word:
Because Hipkiss said "NO" to Millions of Dollars, and the fact that barrister Judith Allison Campbell wanted desperately the money, I had to turn it all into a beacon of despair, so that others would focus on the dollar signs rather than on following the Rule of Law. This way I could expose a criminal lawyer who absconds children for the sake of a divorce. Guess who? I knew she would bite sooner or later. Try and fool me? Say what? She had stated to Judge Darlene Summers in 2021 about wanting her lawyer fees and that's the reason for a sudden re-application to Family Court in 2021 after sitting pretty and doing nothing for 7 Years against TD Insurance. Best Interest of a Child, eh? Barrister Judith Alison Campbell even uttered the same argument to Judge Narissa Somji in 2022. I knew that her Criminal Negligence, and everything else, would shine eventually. She wanted money back in 2013, and now she's after "Pain & Suffering" money in 2021-24-26. TD illegally proposed $0 for P-R's "Lost Income" which translates - no income equals no "Child Support." Judge Adriana Doyle agreed on April 26th, 2024. So, barrister Judith Alison Campbell went after my Attendant Care help. She is the criminal, not me! Justice in Canada is for the elite and not Victims! Yes! I do believe!
I Am Innocent, Justice J. Legault!
? What man says "No!" to Millions Dollars ?
"Follow the Money to Find the Crime!"
5
D
A
Y
S
After all that, Hipkiss must see a member of the Ministry of Solicitor General, Mrs Lisa Cameron. I hope that she will file complaints on my behalf. I hope that she will. Because, if I tell her about a man who was bleeding in a stairway at the courthouse, as I noticed during my climb up the stairs in order to meet her, would she have done nothing about such an insight? I think not! She would alert authorities, of course! Perhaps a crime had been committed, or the man had internal bleeding; nevertheless, she would have warned authorities about my attestation. Likewise, I hope that she does the same and alerts authorities about the crimes that have been committed against Paul-Robert & Hipkiss.
5
N
IGHT
S
Canadian Judicial Council
Hipkiss still fights to prove to the judiciary that the Fundamental Freedom of Speech cannot be taken away from anyone, let alone by Judge Heather J. Williams. Speech is the most Fundamental Freedom know to human kind. With whom is one to trade? A polar bear? How does one learn? By experience. By reading. Non-Disclosures within Settlements are Unconstitutional. Freedom is worth more than Millions of Dollars. End the illegal practice.
Will Hipkiss ever get Justice?
I wish I had a daughter. I'd teach her how to be a lady, but I'd also teach her to be a strong, respectful woman.
Hipkiss must trust the Ministry of Justice. There I shall find hope. Otherwise, my entire life ends with justice not being had. To live life without meaning and purpose is not a life worth living, especially with Acquired Brain Injury. Thus and therefore, I must honour Paul-Robert, for he would have wanted me to do so. Honesty and respect for a life worth living. That's a cool mission. That's what I must do. Yes, indeed. I am Hipkiss. I breathe. I...
The Best Interest of a Child Is Not to Break the Law!
SUICIDE
When life changes, some people turn towards ending their lives.
Sometimes, there's no choice due to anatomical changes.
A person is in control of his or her own body.
Most human beings do in fact miss those who depart willingly.
Life is really short and so precious. Live it please.
If you cannot cope, adhere to my "NO-GO!" theory, or call 911.
I must thank Lynda Cibulis for reaching out about Clinton. He was a boy in Hamilton, Ontario that Paul-Robert once knew. Clinton always wanted to learn. He became a true hero. My heart goes out to his kin. May they find peace.
Thank you Ashley Burke for contacting Hipkiss about Mawt Trood. I knew him at the Rehabilitation Centre of the Ottawa Hospital. He was a true artist. We used to talk and laugh to no end. My heart cries for his family.
Life Expectancy with Acquired Brain Injury:
Many doctors, lawyers, and judges know that life expectancy decreases with brain injury. Judge Giovanna Toscano Roccamo & Al Leaffy taught me this fact. Hipkiss is so thankful to have met Al. Peace...
Thus, therefore, and in conclusion, psychiatrist and psychologist really do not know or understand death in its entirety! How could they? They are not dead yet to understand! Ha! They do not fully understand an altered mind either! They are not living the experience! All they have are HYPOTHESES! Trust who? Trust a Psycho? You are your own doctor!
Why did the Insurers treat P-R like a single man?
Rehabilitation is to do things you used to do, TD.
Why trust such dereliction of duty? Not!